Login | Register
My pages Projects Community openCollabNet

Discussions > dev > Re: discussion of fsvs setup in common binary packages

fsvs
Discussion topic

Back to topic list

Re: discussion of fsvs setup in common binary packages

Author tekknokra
Full name Gunnar Thielebein
Date 2010-08-31 05:28:43 PDT
Message Hi,

Regarding enhancements I stumbled about an issue I noted some time ago with
ignore list behavior.
When new filter rules are applied to (or remove from) ignore list you still need
to add/unversion appropriate files manually.
How hard would it be to implement some enhancement to run add/unversion
internally when ignore list is modified and will that break the philosophy
behind ignore list? I'd admit a sense to keep add/unversion for someone but the
disadvantage is that you loose an overview of the filtered files. Thats what IMO
the ignore list should also be used for. What is your point on this?

« Previous message in topic | 3 of 8 | Next message in topic »

Messages

Show all messages in topic

discussion of fsvs setup in common binary packages tekknokra Gunnar Thielebein 2010-07-22 04:05:48 PDT
     Re: discussion of fsvs setup in common binary packages pmarek P.Marek 2010-07-22 08:10:04 PDT
     Re: discussion of fsvs setup in common binary packages tekknokra Gunnar Thielebein 2010-08-31 05:28:43 PDT
         Re: discussion of fsvs setup in common binary packages pmarek P.Marek 2010-08-31 06:45:25 PDT
             Re: discussion of fsvs setup in common binary packages tekknokra Gunnar Thielebein 2010-08-31 07:06:50 PDT
                 Re: discussion of fsvs setup in common binary packages pmarek P.Marek 2010-08-31 08:10:20 PDT
                     Re: discussion of fsvs setup in common binary packages tekknokra Gunnar Thielebein 2010-08-31 09:15:52 PDT
                         Re: discussion of fsvs setup in common binary packages pmarek P.Marek 2010-08-31 23:49:30 PDT
Messages per page: