Login | Register
My pages Projects Community openCollabNet

Discussions > issues > [Issue 5] New - In "fsvs urls", there is no "priority:" corresponding to "P:"

fsvs
Discussion topic

Hide all messages in topic

All messages in topic

[Issue 5] In "fsvs urls", there is no "priority:" corresponding to "P:"

Author pmarek
Full name P.Marek
Date 2008-10-10 10:22:01 PDT
Message http://fsvs.tigris.o​rg/issues/show_bug.c​gi?id=5



User pmarek changed the following:

                What |Old value |New value
====================​====================​====================​====================​
                  Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--------------------​--------------------​--------------------​--------------------​
              Resolution| |INVALID
--------------------​--------------------​--------------------​--------------------​




------- Additional comments from pmarek at tigris dot org Fri Oct 10 10:22:01 -0700 2008 -------
As per http://fsvs-software​.org/doc/doxygen-gif​/group__url__format.​html
there's a "prio".

[Issue 5] New - In "fsvs urls", there is no "priority:" corresponding to "P:"

Author farzy
Full name Farzad FARID
Date 2008-10-10 08:40:32 PDT
Message http://fsvs.tigris.o​rg/issues/show_bug.c​gi?id=5
                 Issue #|5
                 Summary|In "fsvs urls", there is no "priority:" corresponding
                        |to "P:"
               Component|fsvs
                 Version|current
                Platform|Linux
              OS/Version|All
                     URL|
                  Status|NEW
       Status whiteboard|
                Keywords|
              Resolution|
              Issue type|ENHANCEMENT
                Priority|P3
            Subcomponent|user interface
             Assigned to|pmarek
             Reported by|farzy






------- Additional comments from farzy at tigris dot org Fri Oct 10 08:40:31 -0700 2008 -------
Hi,

With the "fsvs urls" command, the parameter "N:name" has a long version
"name:name", but "P:priority" cannot be written "priority:100", which is a bit
incoherent.

Regards
Messages per page: